Court charges SSS on not apprehending Igboho’s family
On Thursday, the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court criticized the State Security Services (SSS) over failure to produce in court the 12 persons arrested at the residence of Yoruba Nation agitator, Sunday Adeyemo, popularly known as Sunday Igboho.
Justice Obiora Egwuatu, in a ruling, also ordered the SSS to produce the applicants in court at the next adjourned date.
Mr. Egwuatu had, on July 23, ordered the DSS to produce the detainees in court today.
The order followed a fundamental right enforcement suit that the lawyers to the detained applicants, Pelumi Olajengbesi, filed on their behalf, under Section 32(1) and (2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) as well as Sections 6(6), 35 and 36 of 1999 Constitution, as amended.
The 12 persons, who had been in the SSS detention since July 2, are; Abdullateef Ofeyagbe, Amoda Babatunde (Aka Lady K), Tajudeen Erinoyen, Diakola Ademola, Abideen Shittu, and Jamiu Noah.
Others are Ayobami Donald, Adelabe Usman, Oluwapelumi Kunle, Raji Kazeem, Taiwo Opeyemi, and Bamidele Sunday.
The SSS had, on July 1, confirmed that its operatives stormed Mr. Igboho’s home in Ibadan, arrested about 13 suspects; including a female and 12 males.
It also disclosed that two people were killed in the raid.
However, at the resumed hearing on Thursday, Counsel to the SSS, I. Awo, informed the court that the applicants could not be brought because the service procured an order to hold the detainees.
Mr. Awo based the absence of the 12 detainees because investigations into the circumstances that led to their arrest at Mr. Igboho’s home were ongoing.
He hinted that only three were being held by the SSS on the 12 detainees on the court’s order.
The lawyer listed the three detainees in the SSS custody to include: Amoda Babatunde (aka Lady K), Diakola Ademola, and Bamidele Sunday.
Reacting, Mr. Olajengbesi, urged the court to reject the Service’s explanation as it was in contempt of the court’s order.
“The apparent affront on the authority of the court by the DSS cannot be justified,” the applicants’ lawyer argued.
He urged the court to discount the purported detention order procured by the SSS, arguing that it was not a Certified True Copy (CTC).
The lawyer prayed the court to admit his clients to bail.
Mr. Olajengbesi also informed the court that he had been denied access to his client, and urged the court to make an order in that regard.
The ruling, Mr. Egwuatu charged the SSS to purge itself of such a negative public perception as it did not paint a good picture of Nigeria before the international community.
He then ordered the security outfit to produce the detainees and show because why they should not be granted bail.
“An order is hereby made directing the respondent (SSS) to allow the applicants’ counsel to have access to the applicants, and the respondents are ordered to produce the applicants on the next adjourned date,” he said.
He adjourned the matter until August 2 for the continuation of the hearing.
NAN